<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>COMPUTING RESEARCH POLICY BLOG &#187; FY06 Appropriations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/category/fy06-appropriations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog</link>
	<description>Advocacy and Policy Analysis for the Computing Research Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>President&#8217;s Budget: NITRD Numbers for FY07</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2006/02/presidents-budget-nitrd-numbers-for-fy07/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2006/02/presidents-budget-nitrd-numbers-for-fy07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 12:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Competitiveness Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY07 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President&#8217;s budget request for FY 2007 has just been released and we&#8217;ll be dissecting it and providing our analysis as we get through it. But I wanted to post a quick snapshot of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program, the federal government&#8217;s multi-agency IT research and development effort, because 1) it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2006/02/presidents-budget-nitrd-numbers-for-fy07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FY06 Appropriations: In the end game, Basic Research and Cognitive Computing get cut</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/12/fy06-appropriations-in-the-end-game-basic-research-and-cognitive-computing-get-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/12/fy06-appropriations-in-the-end-game-basic-research-and-cognitive-computing-get-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House and Senate negotiators have reached agreement on one of the final hurdles in the FY 06 appropriations process: the FY06 Defense Appropriations bill (H.R. 2863), which contains cuts to DOD Basic Research, DARPA&#8217;s Cognitive Computing program (though not as bad as originally feared) and the long rumored 1.0 percent &#8220;across the board&#8221; cut to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/12/fy06-appropriations-in-the-end-game-basic-research-and-cognitive-computing-get-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FY 06 Appropriations: Energy and Water &#8212; Not so Awful&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/11/fy-06-appropriations-energy-and-water-not-so-awful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/11/fy-06-appropriations-energy-and-water-not-so-awful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;all things considered. The House passed the conference version of the FY 06 Energy and Water Appropriations bill (H.R. 2419) today (399-17). Included in the bill is funding for the Department of Energy&#8217;s Office of Science, and within the Office of Science, the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research. Both the Office of Science and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/11/fy-06-appropriations-energy-and-water-not-so-awful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSF Does Well (All Things Considered) in Conference?</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/11/nsf-does-well-all-things-considered-in-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/11/nsf-does-well-all-things-considered-in-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House and Senate just reached agreement on the FY 06 Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill and it appears NSF will receive just over a 3 percent bump over FY 05. Details are a bit scant at the moment, but it appears NSF will receive $5.65 billion in FY 06 &#8212; that&#8217;s $10 million more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/11/nsf-does-well-all-things-considered-in-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governors Urge President to Support Fundamental Research</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/10/governors-urge-president-to-support-fundamental-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/10/governors-urge-president-to-support-fundamental-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The governors of 27 states have sent a letter to President Bush urging him to &#8220;ensure that federal funding for university-based research remains a top national priority&#8221; in FY 2006 and beyond. In their letter, the 16 Democratic and 11 Republican governors make the case that basic research has been the fuel for innovation in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/10/governors-urge-president-to-support-fundamental-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Approves Nearly 50 Percent Cut to DARPA IT R&amp;D Account</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/10/senate-approves-nearly-50-percent-cut-to-darpa-it-rd-account/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/10/senate-approves-nearly-50-percent-cut-to-darpa-it-rd-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I noted in the last post, the Senate Appropriations Committee included language in the Senate verision of the FY 06 Defense Appropriations bill that would strip $55 million from an element of DARPA&#8217;s Cognitive Computing program &#8212; a move that seems to run counter to recent congressional sentiment on the role of computer science, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/10/senate-approves-nearly-50-percent-cut-to-darpa-it-rd-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FY 06 Appropriations Update: A biggie</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/09/fy-06-appropriations-update-a-biggie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/09/fy-06-appropriations-update-a-biggie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 15th, the Senate approved the FY 2006 Commerce, Science, Justice appropriations bill (its version of the House&#8217;s Science, State, Justice, Commerce bill, which the House approved back in June), approving funding for a number of science agencies for the coming year. As we noted back in June, the Senate indicated it was going [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/09/fy-06-appropriations-update-a-biggie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appropriations Update: Senate CJS Less Generous than House for NSF</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-senate-cjs-less-generous-than-house-for-nsf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-senate-cjs-less-generous-than-house-for-nsf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first details from the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice and Science markup of its FY 2006 appropriations bill seem to indicate the panel has placed a significantly lower priority on the National Science Foundation than their colleagues in the House. Details are scant at the moment &#8212; we&#8217;ll know more when the committee [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-senate-cjs-less-generous-than-house-for-nsf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appropriations Update: Weiner Amendment Targeting NSF Defeated</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-weiner-amendment-targeting-nsf-defeated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-weiner-amendment-targeting-nsf-defeated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just updating yesterday&#8217;s post, the amendment to the House FY 06 Science, State, Justice, Commerce Appropriations Act offered by Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) that would strip $126 million from NSF&#8217;s research account to pay for an increase to the Community Oriented Policing Program (COPS), has been soundly defeated by the House. The final vote was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-weiner-amendment-targeting-nsf-defeated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appropriations Update: NSF, NASA, NIST</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-nsf-nasa-nist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-nsf-nasa-nist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FY06 Appropriations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House today concluded its first day of debate on the FY 2006 Science, State, Justice, Commerce Appropriations Act (H.R. 2682), a bill that would grant an increase in funding for the National Science Foundation and restore some science and aeronautics funding to NASA. This is the first time the House has considered NSF and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2005/06/appropriations-update-nsf-nasa-nist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

