<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>COMPUTING RESEARCH POLICY BLOG &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog</link>
	<description>Advocacy and Policy Analysis for the Computing Research Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>JASON on &#8220;Science of Cyber Security,&#8221; Recommends New Centers</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/12/jason-on-science-of-cyber-security-recommends-new-centers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/12/jason-on-science-of-cyber-security-recommends-new-centers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JASON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research centers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven Aftergood, of the always excellent Secrecy News blog, notes the release of a new report by the JASON panel, an influential, independent advisory committee for the Department of Defense that focuses on issues in science and technology, on the &#8220;Science of Cyber Security.&#8221; Specifically, DOD asked the panel to examine the theory and practice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/12/jason-on-science-of-cyber-security-recommends-new-centers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Panel Examines Cyber Attack Attribution</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/07/house-panel-examines-cyber-attack-attribution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/07/house-panel-examines-cyber-attack-attribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chase Hensel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, the House Committee on Science and Technology&#8217;s subcommittee on Technology and Innovation held a hearing entitled &#8220;Planning for the Future of Cyber Attack Attribution&#8221;. The hearing contained a panel of four witnesses &#8212; Dr. David Wheeler, a Research Staff Member of the Information Technology and Systems Division at the Institute for Defense Analyses, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/07/house-panel-examines-cyber-attack-attribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://science.edgeboss.net/wmedia-live/science/59363/300_science-scitech_090819.asx" length="1244" type="video/x-ms-asf" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Change at DARPA</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/03/the-change-at-darpa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/03/the-change-at-darpa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DARPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dugan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since about 2001, the computing community – through CRA and others, and with lots of mention on this blog – has aired concerns about policy changes at the Defense Advanced Research Programs Agency (DARPA), the Defense Department&#8217;s leading-edge research arm and arguably one of the two most important agencies in the history of computer science. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/03/the-change-at-darpa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HASC Hearing on DOD Information Technology and Cybersecurity</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/02/hasc-hearing-on-dod-information-technology-and-cybersecurity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/02/hasc-hearing-on-dod-information-technology-and-cybersecurity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MelissaNorr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CRA Board member and Government Affairs Committee Chair Fred Schneider will testify along with Phillip Bond of Tech America and David Bodenheimer of Crowell and Moring, LLP at a hearing of the Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, February 25 at 2:00 pm. The hearing will address [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/02/hasc-hearing-on-dod-information-technology-and-cybersecurity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House S&amp;T Committee Considers Cyber Security R&amp;D</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2009/09/house-st-committee-considers-cyber-security-rd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2009/09/house-st-committee-considers-cyber-security-rd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MelissaNorr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diversity in Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Committee on Science and Technologys Research and Science Education Subcommittee marked up a bill designed to amend portions of Cyber Security R&#038;D Act of 2005 today. The aptly named Cybersecurity Research and Development Amendments Act of 2009 (PDF) touches on several things that CRA supports including: Requires the development of a cybersecurity R&#038;D [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2009/09/house-st-committee-considers-cyber-security-rd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House S&amp;T Committee Discusses Cyberspace Policy Review Report With Federal Agencies</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2009/06/house-st-committee-discusses-cyberspace-policy-review-report-with-federal-agencies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2009/06/house-st-committee-discusses-cyberspace-policy-review-report-with-federal-agencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NathanGandomi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Science and Technology Committee held a hearing Tuesday afternoon to review the response of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to the Cyberspace Policy Review.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2009/06/house-st-committee-discusses-cyberspace-policy-review-report-with-federal-agencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Information Week Articles of Interest</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/10/two-information-week-articles-of-interest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/10/two-information-week-articles-of-interest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MelissaNorr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Competitiveness Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D in the Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two recent Information Week articles are of interest. The first article discusses the Commission on Professionals in Science and Technologys newly released report regarding the IT workforce and the need to increase the representation of women and minorities to keep America competitive. This was a theme at the recent conferences in Florida, the Richard Tapia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/10/two-information-week-articles-of-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computerworld on Sputnik, DARPA and Computing</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/computerworld-on-sputnik-darpa-and-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/computerworld-on-sputnik-darpa-and-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D in the Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Computerworld has fantastic coverage of the 50th anniversary of the Sputnik launch (Oct. 4th, 1957) and why, in a sense, we can thank the Soviets for helping create the conditions that led the U.S. to become the technological superpower we&#8217;ve become. Computerworld&#8217;s Gary Anthes&#8217; piece &#8220;Happy Birthday Sputnik! (Thanks for the Internet)&#8221; does a great [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/computerworld-on-sputnik-darpa-and-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DDR&amp;E Asks SECDEF for Lots More S&amp;T Money</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/ddre-asks-secdef-for-lots-more-st-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/ddre-asks-secdef-for-lots-more-st-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recognizing that the Pentagon&#8217;s science and technology investment &#8220;may be inadequate to meet the imposing security threats that challenge our Nation and may not be adequately robust to take advantage of key scientific and technological opportunities that offer breakthrough advantages to our warfighters,&#8221; John Young, the current Director of Defense Research and Engineering, has written [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/ddre-asks-secdef-for-lots-more-st-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times on the Challenges of Network Complexity</title>
		<link>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/ny-times-on-the-challenges-of-network-complexity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/ny-times-on-the-challenges-of-network-complexity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[R&D in the Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwwnew.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Schwartz of the New York Times has an interesting piece today on the rise in complexity of networked applications and the risks that complexity poses. Headlined Who Needs Hackers?, the piece makes the point that the biggest threat to these systems isn&#8217;t malicious users, but complexity itself. Understanding how these giant interconnected systems work [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2007/09/ny-times-on-the-challenges-of-network-complexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

